No transaction is initiated and no trade operation is begun until the first three ALCA phases are complete and documented. This is not a process preference: it is a structural rule. Clients who engage us for execution only, without the assessment and structuring phases, are referred to those phases first. The cost of preparation is always less than the cost of undoing poorly-prepared execution.
Methodological framework
Four phases, in one direction.
ALCA governs every T&T engagement, regardless of sector, size or geography. It establishes a sequence that is not negotiable: assess before committing to a structure, design the structure before executing, build the legal framework around it before it goes live, and execute in a way that is systematized, monitored and scalable.
Assess & Audit · Layer & Structure · Comply & Protect · Activate & Automate
Executive summary
ALCA is the four-phase consulting methodology that governs every T&T engagement, regardless of sector, size, or geography. It establishes a non-negotiable sequence: assess the full picture before committing to any structure, design the structure before beginning any execution, build the legal framework around the structure before it goes live, and execute in a way that is systematized, monitored, and scalable.
The methodology emerged from a consistent observation across the domains in which the group operates: the most costly failures in business do not come from poor execution. They come from executing the wrong thing, in the wrong structure, without the legal protection the situation required. ALCA is the organizational response to that observation.
The four phases each have a distinct primary objective, a defined set of specific objectives, a disciplined methodology, and measurable criteria for completion. No phase is skipped. No phase begins before the preceding phase is complete. Every phase produces documented deliverables that the client reviews and approves before work advances.
Philosophy
Preparation, not execution, is the differentiator.
T&T operates on a foundational belief: that the quality of a consulting engagement is determined not by the sophistication of its execution but by the quality of its preparation. The firms and individuals that consistently produce good outcomes in commodity trading and international food trade are those that prepare rigorously: they know what they are doing, why they are doing it, how it is structured, and that it is legally sound, before they begin. This belief has two practical consequences that set the group apart from conventional consulting.
Legal and regulatory compliance is not something that is added to an engagement after it is designed. It is part of the design. The sanctions compliance procedure for a commodity trade is built into the counterparty onboarding workflow. The food safety documentation for an import is built into the supply chain structure. By the time execution begins, compliance is not a checklist: it is the way the system works.
Why ALCA exists
The common failure mode.
Across both consulting lines, a consistent pattern of failure appears in the businesses that engage us after something has gone wrong. The specifics differ by sector. The root cause is always the same.
What went wrong
Counterparty appeared on an OFAC-linked entity list. Transaction frozen. Legal costs exceeded trade value.
Root cause
No KYC/AML due diligence. No sanctions screening. No contractual protections.
What went wrong
Cargo held at port of entry. Certifications invalid. Labeling non-compliant. €80,000 in losses.
Root cause
No product compliance assessment. No certificate verification. No labeling review before shipment.
In every case, the failure was preventable. In every case, the prevention was available at a fraction of the eventual cost. ALCA is the methodology that makes prevention the default.
The standard
Compliance by design, not by patch.
Phase 01
Due Diligence & Diagnostic
Assess & Audit
Complete intelligence before any action
Primary objective
To establish, before any execution begins, a complete and verified understanding of what is actually true about the client's situation, the market, the counterparty, or the opportunity (as distinct from what is assumed or believed); what risks are material and how severe they are; what regulatory obligations apply and what compliance requires; and what the optimal sequence and structure of the engagement should be.
The Assess & Audit phase exists because action taken before adequate intelligence gathering is the most common and most expensive mistake in consulting: not poor execution, but poor preparation. A commodity trade that begins before the counterparty has been properly screened is not a trade; it is an exposure. A food import that begins before the product has been qualified for the destination market is not a commercial operation; it is a risk.
The purpose of Phase 01 is not to produce paperwork. It is to ensure that every consequential decision in the engagement (what structure to use, what legal framework to build, how to execute) is made on the basis of verified fact rather than assumption. Its quality determines the quality of everything that follows.
Specific objectives
Every engagement begins with a gap between what the client believes to be true and what is actually true. The Audit identifies that gap and closes it. No assumption is carried into Phase 02 that was not verified in Phase 01.
Every engagement has risks. The Audit's role is to surface them all, before they become problems, and rank them by severity, likelihood, and the cost of their occurrence. The output is a risk register that becomes the governance document for the engagement.
For any engagement with an optimization or growth objective, the Audit maps all opportunity areas and ranks them by estimated ROI relative to implementation complexity. That ranking determines the sequence of Phase 04.
Which regulations apply, in which jurisdictions, in what respects? What does compliance require? What are the consequences of non-compliance? Regulatory surprises in Phase 04 are Audit failures.
Is this engagement (this trade, this import) viable? Under what conditions, at what cost, on what timeline? The Audit produces a clear feasibility assessment that becomes the basis for the go/no-go decision.
The Audit closes with a documented roadmap: what will be done, in what sequence, by what milestone, at what estimated cost. This is the client's visibility into the full engagement before they commit to it.
Before Phase 01 begins
- A signed engagement letter or proposal accepted by the client, defining the scope of the Audit.
- A completed pre-session questionnaire capturing quantitative data about the client's current situation: volumes, processes, tools, financial parameters, existing contracts, regulatory status.
- A signed confidentiality agreement before any counterparty, pricing, or structure information is shared.
Without this phase
Without a complete Assess phase, every subsequent phase operates on assumptions. The structure in Phase 02 is designed around a situation that may not be accurately understood. The compliance framework in Phase 03 addresses risks that may not be the real risks. The cost of correcting these errors in Phase 04, when resources are committed and execution is underway, is an order of magnitude higher than the cost of the Audit itself.
Deliverables · Audit report + risk register
- Audit report: factual baseline, current state assessment, key findings
- Risk register: all material risks, severity ranking (1–5), likelihood ranking, cost estimate if realized
- Opportunity map: all identified opportunities, ranked by ROI/complexity ratio
- Regulatory landscape summary: applicable regimes by jurisdiction, compliance requirements, key obligations
- Feasibility assessment: go/no-go recommendation with conditions and caveats
- 90-day roadmap: phases, milestones, timeline, cost estimate, responsibilities
Phase 02
Architecture & Design
Layer & Structure
The plan before execution
Primary objective
To produce, before any execution begins, a complete and approved structural blueprint of the engagement: what will be transacted or implemented; how it will be organized commercially and operationally; how risk will be allocated; what documentation will govern it; and what constraints the structure must satisfy to accommodate the compliance framework that Phase 03 will build around it.
Structure determines outcome. The structure of a commodity deal determines how risk is allocated between parties, who bears logistics exposure, which law governs disputes, and what remedies exist if performance fails. The design of a supply chain determines landed cost, documentation complexity, customs risk, and operational resilience.
None of these structural decisions are cheap to change once execution has begun. A deal restructured mid-trade because the original structure did not address a regulatory requirement incurs legal costs, potential counterparty dispute, and reputational risk. A supply chain that must be re-routed adds weeks and costs to every shipment. Everything that can be decided in advance is decided in advance.
Specific objectives
Every risk identified in Phase 01 must be addressed by a structural feature in Phase 02. Every opportunity must be incorporated into the design. The Layer phase is where intelligence becomes architecture.
The structure memorandum captures every significant decision, not just those reached but the alternatives considered and the reasons they were rejected. That prevents scope creep and resolves future disputes.
The structure must accommodate the legal framework Phase 03 will build around it. When Phase 03 begins, it should only need to formalize the compliance elements already incorporated into the design.
Experienced operators know which structural choices create downstream problems: which Incoterms create documentation risk, which deal structures create credit exposure. The memorandum reflects that knowledge.
The memorandum is the single source of truth from Phase 02 onwards. Changes after approval require a documented amendment, reviewed and signed by both parties.
The memorandum is presented in a formal review session at the close of Phase 02. The client's written approval is required before Phase 03 begins: informed consent to the engagement as designed, not just as described.
What gets structured, by division
- Commodities & Energy: deal structure memorandum (parties, product specifications, delivery terms, pricing mechanism, settlement), financial model with P&L projection and sensitivity analysis, hedging strategy and instrument selection, applicable master agreement framework (ISDA, EFET, GAFTA, or custom), trade finance structure (LC, CAD, bank guarantee, parent guarantee), internal approval and execution authority protocol.
- Food & Beverage Trade: supply chain design (origin, logistics routing, transit times, cold chain where applicable), Incoterms selection and rationale (FOB, CIF, DAP, DDP), payment terms structure (LC under UCP 600, documentary collection D/P or D/A, TT, open account), logistics architecture (freight forwarder, customs broker, port of entry, last-mile), pricing model and landed cost calculation, documentation framework, supplier contract terms.
Without this phase
Engagements that skip formal structuring invariably encounter the same problems: scope disputes about what was agreed; structural choices that cannot accommodate the compliance requirements, discovered only when the compliance phase begins; and operational problems arising from decisions that were never consciously made, only defaulted into. The memorandum prevents all of these by making every significant decision explicit before it has consequences.
Deliverables · Structure memorandum
- Structure memorandum: the complete architectural blueprint, approved by client signature
- Financial model: P&L projection, sensitivity analysis, ROI validation against Phase 01 estimates
- Documentation framework: full list of required documents and the parties responsible for each
- Deal term sheet / commercial term summary: agreed commercial parameters
- Implementation timeline: phase-by-phase delivery schedule with milestones
- Client sign-off: written approval before Phase 03 commences
Phase 03
Legal & Regulatory Framework
Comply & Protect
Protection built into the structure
Primary objective
To ensure that, by the time Phase 04 execution begins, the engagement is fully compliant with every applicable legal and regulatory obligation, protected by every legal instrument required for the client's position, and equipped with the ongoing monitoring procedures that will maintain compliance as circumstances and regulations evolve.
Legal and regulatory compliance is not the natural result of good intentions or professional conduct. It is the result of deliberate, structured process. Every domain the group serves has specific, enforceable obligations with material consequences for non-compliance, consequences that are not theoretical but regularly realized: criminal liability for sanctions violations in commodity trading; cargo seizure and market access bans for food safety non-compliance; regulatory sanctions for energy and derivatives trading violations.
These consequences share a common characteristic: they are preventable. And they are always more expensive to remedy after the fact than to prevent in advance.
Specific objectives
By jurisdiction, by sector, by the specific characteristics of the engagement. The regulatory map is comprehensive: not only the obvious obligations but the full universe of applicable requirements.
Where measures are already in place, Phase 03 evaluates their adequacy. Where gaps exist, it designs the specific measures required to close them. The output is a gap analysis, not a list.
Contracts, policies, agreements and disclosures are not boilerplate. They are designed for the specific engagement, the specific counterparty relationships, and the specific jurisdictions involved.
Phase 03 verifies that the structure designed in Phase 02 is compatible with every applicable requirement, and modifies it before execution where it is not. Structural compliance issues discovered in Phase 04 are Phase 03 failures.
Compliance is not a point-in-time event. Regulations change and sanctions lists are updated. Phase 03 establishes the monitoring procedures and the escalation protocols for responding to them.
The integration principle
The most important characteristic of how compliance is built is when it is built: before execution, not after. It is always cheaper, faster and more effective designed into a transaction than retrofitted around one that already exists.
- A commodity deal with proper AML/KYC documentation from the beginning of the counterparty relationship has a complete compliance file before the first trade. Reconstructing that documentation after a regulatory inquiry, when records may be incomplete and the relationship may be adversarial, is both harder and less credible.
- A food import with all required certifications verified before shipment moves without customs delays. Providing substitute documentation at the port of entry, when the cargo is already there, is not possible for most regulated certificates. The cargo is held or rejected, at full cost to the importer.
Without this phase
Every engagement that skips or abbreviates the Comply phase operates with hidden liability. The commodity trade executed without proper AML documentation may already have incurred a sanctions violation. The food import that ships without verifying certification is scheduled to be rejected. The Comply phase converts hidden liability into documented compliance.
Deliverables · Compliance package
- Regulatory compliance map: all applicable regimes, obligations, and gap assessment
- Legal instrument package: all contracts, policies, agreements, and disclosures prepared
- KYC/AML/Sanctions file: counterparty due diligence documentation
- Sector-specific compliance package: MiFID II and REMIT for energy and commodity derivatives; HACCP, FDA and EFSA standards, customs and phytosanitary requirements for food trade
- Risk documentation framework: file structure and maintenance protocol
- Ongoing monitoring protocol: what is monitored, how frequently, and what triggers escalation
Phase 04
Execution & Systematization
Activate & Automate
Operational implementation and monitoring
Primary objective
To deliver the engagement's committed result (the trade, the shipment, the system) within the structure and compliance framework established in the preceding phases, and simultaneously to build the operational infrastructure that allows the client to sustain, monitor and scale that result independently of our ongoing involvement.
Execution is the phase that most clients instinctively want to begin with. It is also the phase that is most expensive to execute poorly. The value of the three preceding phases is that they make Phase 04 effective: the structure is designed, the compliance framework is in place, and the team knows exactly what it is transacting.
But the phase has an objective that extends beyond the immediate deliverable. Every engagement should leave the client in a structurally better position than before. A commodity trade is not just executed: the workflow and compliance calendar are institutionalized. A food import is not just shipped: the tracking and documentation workflow are established as repeatable procedure. That is what distinguishes systematized execution from ad-hoc execution.
Specific objectives
Phase 04 does not make structural decisions: those were made in Phase 02 and approved by the client. Any modification is documented, reviewed and approved before implementation. Unilateral structural changes during execution are not permitted.
Contracts are signed before obligations are incurred, required documentation is collected before shipments are released, and regulatory reports are filed on schedule.
Every execution produces data. Phase 04 ensures it is captured and interpreted (position risk in commodity trading, shipment status in food trade) and surfaces problems early enough to address them without disruption.
Independence requires documentation. Trade documentation covers the complete transaction file; shipment documentation covers the complete compliance and logistics file, comprehensive enough for the client to operate without us.
Documentation without understanding creates paper compliance, not operational capability. Phase 04 includes structured knowledge transfer: training, walkthroughs of operational procedures, and sessions that confirm the team can operate independently.
Every engagement closes with a measurement of actual outcomes against the estimates produced in Phase 01. Where results differ, positively or negatively, the variance is documented and analyzed.
For continuing engagements, Phase 04 sets the schedule for continuing reviews: quarterly audits, annual structural reviews, and ongoing compliance monitoring. The methodology becomes the operational rhythm of the relationship.
Milestone structure and payment protocol
All engagements operate on a milestone-based payment structure. Payments are released, from escrow in escrow-enabled engagements, only upon documented client approval of each milestone's acceptance criteria. If a milestone does not meet its criteria, it is corrected before payment is released.
- 40%: Phase 01–02 completion. Audit report, structure memorandum and the Phase 03 compliance package delivered and formally approved by the client in writing.
- 30%: Phase 04 intermediate. Beta shipment or first trade executed in controlled conditions, reviewed and approved against defined acceptance criteria.
- 30%: Final delivery. Trade settled, shipment delivered and accepted. Documentation transferred, training completed, all legal instruments live.
Without this phase
Without systematized execution, even the best-structured, fully-compliant engagement can fail to deliver lasting value. A commodity trade that is executed but not institutionalized has no operational infrastructure for the next trade. A food import that is shipped but not systematized creates the same documentation challenges for every subsequent shipment. Activation without automation produces results that do not scale.
Deliverables · Operational systems + SLA
- The primary engagement deliverable: trade executed and settled, shipment delivered and accepted
- Complete transaction file: full client ownership, documented, organized
- Operational documentation: comprehensive enough for client-independent operation
- Trade file and workflow documentation
- Live training session with recording: all operational procedures demonstrated and explained
- Monitoring infrastructure: dashboards, alerts and reporting configured and operational
- Compliance monitoring calendar: ongoing obligations, review schedule, escalation protocol
- ROI measurement: actual outcomes vs. Phase 01 estimates, with variance analysis
- SLA coverage: 30–90 days post-delivery priority support, per engagement scope
Handover
Client independence as the success criterion.
The measure of a successful engagement is not client satisfaction at delivery: it is client capability thirty days after delivery. A client who requires our ongoing involvement to manage their trade or run their supply chain is a client whose engagement was not fully successful. The documentation, training and knowledge transfer built into Phase 04 are not optional deliverables: they are the standard by which the phase's success is measured. Retained support should be a client's choice, not a client's necessity.
Core principles
Invariant across both divisions.
Four principles govern every ALCA engagement, regardless of the division or the size of the mandate.
No engagement advances to execution without a complete Phase 01. No commodity trade is initiated with an unscreened counterparty. No food import is shipped on an unqualified product. The cost of the Audit phase is invariably less than the cost of undoing an engagement that was poorly prepared. This principle is non-negotiable.
Every engagement has a documented, approved structure before any execution resource is committed. The structure memorandum is not a planning document: it is the governance document for the engagement. Changes after approval require documented review and sign-off.
Compliance is built into the structure of the engagement in Phase 03, before execution begins. It is part of the architecture: of the contractual framework, the counterparty onboarding process, the documentation workflow. By the time execution begins, compliance is not something the client needs to think about. It is the way the system works.
Every Phase 04 delivery includes not just the primary result but the operational infrastructure that allows the client to sustain, monitor and build on that result independently. The success criterion is client capability, not client dependency.
Contracting
What can be engaged, and in what order.
The sequence is the protocol, so it is also the price list. Each package carries everything before it, because a phase without its predecessors is not something this framework can deliver: the structure would be designed on an assessment that was never made.
Phase 01 only
Assess & Audit, delivered as a written report. The whole of it: the audit, the risk register, the regulatory picture and a recommendation to proceed or to stop. Most clients who arrive uncertain start here and decide afterwards.
Covers: Phase 01
Phases 01 and 02
The assessment, and then the structure designed on top of it: the transaction architecture, the counterparty and instrument design, and the structure memorandum that governs everything after it.
Covers: Phase 01 · Phase 02
Phases 01 to 03
Everything up to and including the legal and compliance framework. At the end of this the engagement is ready to execute, and that is the earliest point at which a transaction is allowed to begin.
Covers: Phase 01 · Phase 02 · Phase 03
The full mandate
All four phases, through to systematized execution and handover. The engagement most clients end up in, and the one the credit against the due diligence report applies to.
Covers: Phase 01 · Phase 02 · Phase 03 · Phase 04
Cannot be engaged
- Phase 04 on its own.
- Any phase without the ones that come before it.
Phase 01, on its own, at a published price.
The audit phase is also sold as a standalone due diligence report on a counterparty you found yourself, at a fixed price and on a fixed deadline. It is credited against the mandate if you engage within 60 days.
Engage
Tell us where the risk sits.
If the structure does not protect you, we will say so before anything is committed.
ALCA Framework™ · Version 2.0
Talk to an advisor
Not sure what you need yet?
Book an hour with an advisor: one deal, one counterparty, one document set. USD 150 per hour, in your own time zone.